The American Medical Association (AMA) and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced a compromise on the switch to ICD-10-CM. The AMA, for its part, will begin investing time and effort into helping physicians get ready for the switch. CMS, in response, will approve claims encoded with ICD-10-CM even if the specific ICD-10-CM code used wouldn't normally meet "specificity" criteria for payment. That means a doctor would receive payment for coding an injury with a code that does not indicate the laterality of the injury, for example.
Each side, however, remains firm on its stance on whether the switch should happen at all. The AMA and many of its state-level affiliates (especially California, New York, Texas, and Pennsylvania) remain staunchly opposed to the switch. CMS remains insistent that the switch should and will occur. Of course, Congress overrode that insistence last year, postponing the switch by an additional year. This year, legislative relief from the switch seems unlikely, although we should all continue to press for it. Stop the switch!
Sunday, July 12, 2015
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
More doctors organizations oppose the switch
The state medical societies of the four largest states in the country--California, Texas, Florida, and New York--have announced new opposition to the switch to ICD-10-CM. In their letter (warning: PDF) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the four societies state ...mandatory implementation of the ICD-10-CM coding system is a looming disaster. They note that simpler transitions to the HIPAA 5010 standard (a pre-requisite to ICD-10-CM) and the National Provider Identifier both had ...voluminous technical problems...
They end by saying: We remain steadfast in our belief that the ICD-10 coding system offers no real advantages to physicians and our patients — and certainly no advantages to justify the time and expense the entire health care system has invested in this transition. As we have documented here, they are correct. We should stop the switch.
They end by saying: We remain steadfast in our belief that the ICD-10 coding system offers no real advantages to physicians and our patients — and certainly no advantages to justify the time and expense the entire health care system has invested in this transition. As we have documented here, they are correct. We should stop the switch.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)